![[Img #74676]](https://thelatestnews.world/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Laser-artificial-neuron-150x150.jpg)
“Neither I nor those around me filter any emails. That is the reason why I have not resigned.” The State Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, spoke with these words this Wednesday at the last minute. In an interview in The Night in 24 hours (RTVE 24 Hours Channel) García Ortiz has spoken his first words in public after it became known this Wednesday morning that the Supreme Court was opening a criminal case against him due to the complaint by Isabel Díaz Ayuso’s partner for revealing secrets . This is the first criminal case that the Supreme Court has opened against a sitting attorney general.
“I am not investigated nor am I accused,” the prosecutor wanted to clarify as soon as he began the interview with Xabier Fortes, to whom he confessed that the Supreme Court’s decision has caused him “a lot of concern” and has made him “reflect.” “I assume personally all the decisions I make,” he insisted. “I assume that I made or that we made a press release for which I am solely responsible to deny a hoax,” he remarked. What’s more, García Ortiz has assured that “he would make that press release again.”
García Ortiz refers to the statement last March with which the Madrid Prosecutor’s Office tried to deny various false information about the case of double tax fraud of Díaz Ayuso’s partner and for which the Supreme Court is now investigating him for alleged revelation of secrets. Specifically, the press release denied the messages that were sent from Díaz Ayuso’s entourage to various media, ensuring that it was the Prosecutor’s Office who offered a compliant agreement to Alberto González Amador when in reality it was he who raised it.
Regarding his decision not to resign despite the Supreme Court’s cause, García Ortiz has assured that it has been “the most important reflection” that he has had to make this Wednesday “thinking of his colleagues” and that he has finally decided to stay “with absolute conviction, thinking that it is the best in the short and long term for the Prosecutor’s Office.”
Asked if he feels he is a victim of a kind of political “hunt”, García Ortiz has acknowledged that although “any State Attorney General is called into question for having been appointed by a Government” also on other occasions, in his case “it is not “They respected neither the 50, nor the 100, nor the 500 days.” “The responsibility of the position must support these persecutions,” he concluded.
In its order this Wednesday, the Supreme Court explained that the statement issued by the Prosecutor’s Office on the case of Alberto González Amador contained information already revealed by the media, but focuses on the leak of the emails in which his lawyer acknowledged the crimes. two tax crimes and offered to make a deal. The investigation will focus, therefore, on whether it was the attorney general who previously leaked those emails to the media.
But García Ortiz has denied the major. As he insisted, he has not leaked any emails. “As you understand, the State Attorney General is not dedicated to leaking emails at night,” he told the interviewer. He has also highlighted that he was “not aware” of those emails “until a media outlet talks about those emails.”
The case that has now been taken up by the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court began when Alberto González Amador, partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso and accused of confessed double tax fraud, accused the Prosecutor’s Office of having leaked confidential data about his case in a public statement.
In fact, in that statement the Madrid Prosecutor’s Office explained how the contacts had taken place between the businessman’s lawyer and the prosecutor who was investigating him to reach a possible agreement in a future trial. In the previous hours, both Miguel Ángel Rodríguez and various media outlets had reported that it was the Public Ministry that had offered the pact. But it was González Amador’s own defense that wrote to the Public Ministry to acknowledge his tax crimes and offer an agreement.
Add Comment