economy and politics

The Prosecutor’s Office requests a year in prison for the young man who assaulted his partner live on TikTok

The Prosecutor's Office requests a year in prison for the young man who assaulted his partner live on TikTok

The young man accused of assaulting his wife while doing a live show on Tik Tok will be tried on February 21. In the speedy trial held this Wednesday morning in the Court of First Instance and Instruction number 3 of Soria, with jurisdiction over Violence against Women, no agreement has been reached and it has not been possible to pass sentence. , so you will have to appear in court again in three weeks.

The Prosecutor’s Office has requested a year in prison for a crime of mistreatment of articles 153.1 and 153.3 and the deprivation of permission to carry weapons for three years, as well as the prohibition to approach and communicate with the victim during the same period of time, according to the information from the Press Office of the Superior Court of Justice of Castilla y León collected by Europa Press.

The Court has given his lawyer a period of three days to present a defense brief before the Criminal Court, which now assumes the jurisdiction to hold the trial.

At this morning’s hearing, the defendant has invoked his right not to testify. So has the victim, who has also renounced any protection measure, to have legal assistance and to be recognized by the forensic doctor.

The Prosecutor’s Office has requested, as a precautionary measure until the trial is held, a protection order, although the Court has denied it because “with the data available up to now, it is not appreciated that there is an objective situation of risk for the alleged victim.” The judge adds that since the events occurred, four days ago, the couple has continued to live together. “The defendant has no criminal record. The alleged victim has not filed a complaint against her husband and, in today’s statement as injured party, she has asked that they not separate her from him and that they also not separate her two-year-old son from her father.

In his order, the judge points out that “ultimately, assessing the actions carried out, it is not considered that the facts presented justify the adoption of any protection measure for the alleged victim by not noticing that she is in an objective situation of risk: there is no situation of urgent or imminent danger based on the data set forth in the preceding paragraphs.”

Source link