We live in such a liberal democracy that showing concern and rejecting the possibility of a nuclear war on European soil is considered putinisthigh treason or what is more ridiculous: equidistant. In the free world and of reason that represents the West it has become dangerous to think and ask questions to understand how much it affects our life, everything that surrounds us, which is precisely what determines a person as civilized and not their credit card.
The culture of cancellation with this woke pseudo-religion that plagues the West is charged civilian casualties every day with the virulence of the mass in networks and the participation of politicians addicted to tyranny and focus. Not being attracted to a person trans is considered transphobic, pointing out the origin of crime is racist, yelling stupid things at a woman is rape, and not applauding your impoverishment due to the 2030 Agenda makes you a climate criminal.
In a war the first thing that is controlled is propaganda. But if we are a democracy at war to defend democratic values, first of all we must go to Parliament
Suddenly, the news normalizes the possibility of a nuclear attack and you cannot reflect or show concern in the face of this chilling scenario. Regarding the war in Ukraine, historical data cannot be provided, such as the Russian reality of Crimea since 1783, when Catherine II he got it from the turk. The ethnic and linguistic context of the donbasat war since 2014, nor of the events of odessa of that year. It is not possible to speak of antecedents to the conflict, nor of the interests of third countries in it. Why, since 2014, has the Kremlin dealt with any event in Ukraine with the White House and not with the new government in kyiv, as if it had been elected from there? ? Isn’t it a democracy? Why does Russia ask to ensure the supply of water to Crimea?
In the West it was considered a trait of Putin’s tyranny wanting to decide who should be Ukraine’s allies, or at least its neutrality vis-à-vis its enemies, by barring its entry into NATO. But the destruction of the Nordstream I and II gas pipeline -who benefits from this?- has blown away any possibility of an important trade relationship between Russia and Europe, by deciding who is responsible for the explosions with whom the Europeans can trade. With Russia they have made it clear that they are not. What economic consequences in terms of devastating poverty does Russia have if it is left without its closest market, its main source of wealth? What consequences of impoverishment will it have for Europe? What solutions to a conflict can there be when all possibility of trade between two areas is destroyed without either of them having decided? Why, faced with this serious and revealing fact for the reality of Europeans, especially Germany, the response has been media and political silenceeven blame Russia contravening the laws of logic and physics?
Why don’t they inform and ask the Spaniards for authorization for any action of war, explaining its consequences? Where is the transparency?
I understand that in a war the first thing to do is control propaganda. But if we are a democracy at war, and especially when we are told that the war is to defend democratic values, first of all we must go to Parliament. Why don’t they inform and ask the Spaniards for authorization for any war action, explaining its consequences? Such as the shipment of weapons or the training of troops on Spanish soil. What commitments have you made? Pedro Sanchez against foreign powers that have increased the Defense budget by 25% while the border of Ceuta and melilla is defended with riot gear by abandoned police officers?
We can’t ask questions, we can’t easily access information, we can’t hold them accountable. We cannot hesitate before the enthusiasts of the path towards a nuclear war under threat of being accused of Putinism. Is Donbas, that region that did not know of its existence until the beginning of 2022, worth a nuclear war of unknown consequences for you and your children? If you have hesitated for a second, you are an equidistant for the sheriff of liberty Ukrainian in Spain, who act like fans of nuclear war to which they have no intention of going.
The crazy songs blinded by foolishness encouraging not to give up, proposing a binary world, wrong and far from rationality. As if blaming Putin were enough to walk irresponsibly to disaster, they heat up an atmosphere in Europe that does not resemble that of the Cold War, but that of 1914.
The greatest dehumanization of the individual is to take away his freedom of thought and the most absolute power is to achieve submission without violence, of his own free will.
War has not been declared in Europe and peace has already been outlawed. Elon Muskthe owner of Tesla who helped Ukraine start the war over Russia’s attacks on kyiv, raised on Twitter a proposal for peace agreement which included Ukraine’s non-entry into NATO, legal referendums in the Donbas and ensuring Crimea’s water supply. Musk’s proposal earned him a response from the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany in the following terms: Fuck off. Zelensky in the last few hours has called for a preemptive strike against Russia before it drops a nuclear bomb. Is Europe sure that it wants to unite its destiny with people who have different interests and despise any possibility of peace without evaluating the consequences? Is reason definitely dead? What is the proposed ending? The absolute destruction of Russia? Is the desired setting 1918?
For once the Pope Francisco acts like a Catholic by asking for a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine, it cost him accusations of being sympathetic to communist terror. What should the leader of a Catholic Church ask for? The annihilation of Russia? If not even the Pope can ask for peace, what can the rest of us say to the war sheriffs? The greatest dehumanization of the individual is take away your freedom of thought and the most absolute power is to achieve submission without violence, by one’s own will. Asking for control, transparency, information, the possibility of a conversation raising doubts and asking for reflection before launching ourselves into a war conflict with devastating consequences that will take place on European soil, not American soil, is an activity that is persecuted, proscribed and high risk in this European democracy to defend.
