A king, an actress, the CNI, an ominous silence and various blackmails

No one dared to say it, but the king walked around naked. Yes, in the famous photos that you have seen, he is dressed and kissing with Bárbara Rey, but do not rule out that in future photos, which must have been taken in hundreds, Juan Carlos I shows us, in fact, as naked as the king in the story. Everything will work out, it gives the impression that we have only seen the shadow appear behind the curtains, the hoof from under the door. Pay attention to the cascade of shamelessness that may fall upon us from now on, with the iron belt around the now recognized royal commission agent broken, this guy who pocketed envelopes worth millions of euros.

Various considerations regarding this sordid spectacle of stolen images, according to what the chronicles of these days tell us. The king’s adultery bothers, to begin with, not because he was a rather libertine crowned head, nor was it the first or the only one, but because he and his relatives, not to mention friends, relatives and other associates, have not stopped in their ways. many years of reign of being surrounded by priests, bishops and cardinals, even visits to the Pope of Rome, always ready to attend the lavish events organized by the Catholic Church, golds here, golds there, poor but wasteful. Hypocrites he and his fiefdoms, as much as the high clerics who danced the water for them.

Let’s also stop for a moment at the sordid story of an 11-year-old boy recording in 1994 the love scenes of his mother and a very tall man, although the happy couple had already begun their intimate encounters in 1977. Can we be surprised that now Does the same infant, today a full-fledged gentleman, with no known job or benefit, make a living selling his mother’s loving interiorities? The present actions confirm the results produced in childhood by such a careful education received at home since childhood, rich in ethical and moral values. And this seems to be, or at least that’s what Christ the Son’s friends say, the first in a series of so-called engaged photos. We said it at the beginning, tie up the males.

But the important thing here, what we should pay attention to, is not the starlet nor her then tender infant and hard-working photographer. Bárbara Rey has been very master of going with whoever she wanted, king or bricklayer, thug or refined, marrying a man of rather deplorable fame, the tamer Ángel Cristo, and dedicating herself to living as she wanted or could. Even if he has squandered the millions obtained from this work that we are discussing here. There she is. Another thing, of course, is blackmail and it is true that the State, via CNI, was paying millions – of pesetas, let’s not go too far – to the well-known actress. Has any of your important officials assumed the responsibility of carrying the envelopes in hand or depositing those moneys into a certain checking account?

The cool thing is something else, and it is the actions of King Juan Carlos I, on the one hand, and how the national institutions, such as the aforementioned CNI, but not only, dedicated themselves to organizing the monarch’s lavish amorous evenings, first, and to paying Then, with the money of you and the person writing this, the blackmail of the Royal Family, that is, the State, which apparently lasted for years. Because the fiery lover didn’t even have the dignity to say I pay for my relief with my money, which is why it comes out of my ears, my good sword blows have cost me filling the safe, and he allowed us to pay for the party. . Blackmail? To the master armorer, that I am busy going hunting and finding a new lover. To this general shamelessness we must add, let’s get into the matter and despite it, the ominous silence that covered and hid from the citizens, probably for a couple of decades, these and many other despicable actions of the current king emeritus, always protected by a layer of respect – why, what merits did the good gentleman accumulate so that we would keep silent about his miseries? – that today no one understands.

Did the press at the time say anything? No. Did we journalists look elsewhere while we had such unpraiseworthy behavior before our eyes? It is easy to answer affirmatively, but allow this old feather, already with drooping flesh and somewhat liquefied brain, to expose some nuances to you. Of course there were well-known instructions, although never made explicit, that the king should not be touched at all. That’s how the journalistic companies wanted it and that’s how the profession accepted it. I can and do confirm, to give a not important but significant example, that Canal+’s Guiñol was never able to include Juan Carlos among its dozens of characters. Felipe, Aznar, etc., etc., but not the king. No discussion. This was so, and in a resounding way, because Juan Carlos I was a revered character – for power and its surroundings, of course, but also because he always had strong popular support, let those who do not want to admit it say mass – who had brought us democracy after the death of the dictator, and that also saved us from a brutal coup d’état, -they feel it, damn it!- and there was nothing more to talk about. Naive? It may be, let’s admit it, but it was not easy in those years for the respectable public, nor for journalists, to glimpse this predatory being that roamed, as has been seen later, through rich beds of milk and honey, taking some good kilos.

For now, it was not easy then to know that these events were happening. Rumors? Yes, of course, but I don’t remember that anyone at that time could have confirmed those meetings. There are more explanations. Should we really have published a romance between the king and an adult? In addition to the obvious morbidity, of the king and the videte, did that information fit into the information standards? Surely it would have been the so-called press of the heart that was in charge of such a task, but their companies were not the best prepared to risk their necks. I speak now of the romances – surely that of Bárbara Rey was not the only one – that of the other fundraising skills of the monarch already mentioned, I do not remember that we had any news of those enormous monies deposited in obscure accounts in distant countries.

Everything was precipitated at the beginning of this century and subsequent years. Elephants on the one hand, and Corinna Larsen, on the other – 65 million, this time in euros, given to the good lady! – were revealing a Juan Carlos that until then, due to that imposed but also self-imposed veneration, we had never been able to see clearly. He is now seeking, according to what we are told, to vindicate his figure with a book, they say of memoirs, what a laugh, which is titled Reconciliation. With who? With Bárbara Rey and some other ladies? With Sofia of Habsburg? With Corinna? With Iñaki Urdangarin? Perhaps he is more pretentious, and intends to reconcile with the Spanish people whom he has deceived and defrauded for years?

It is good that we flagellate ourselves for not doing the unmasking work that we should have done. We did not fulfill our duty, for sure. But in defense of the guild of the elderly, let us say that we have not seen the younger ones devoting themselves tirelessly to the investigation of accounts in Swiss banks, for example, to locate those monies that maintain the very touched emeritus in his exile from the Emirates. Or find out who pays for your numerous stays in Spain. Or what money reaches the family of the aforementioned, daughters, grandchildren, nephews and that large crowd of young people wearing the Spanish flag in caps and watches that gather around them, poor grandpa, how badly these ungrateful people have treated you. Many things have already been known about these CNI payments, there are even books about it, but surely there are many details left unrevealed about how and from what accounts the money came from for Corinna Larsen to buy so many necklaces. Investigate, investigate. It is never too late if the happiness is good. What is ours is hopeless, what is yours, brave young people, is.

Two final questions. For bothering. Is Felipe VI responsible for the outrages committed by his father? The answer is surely no. And the last: What merits, values ​​or virtues had Felipe de Borbón accumulated in 1986, when he came of age, to be proclaimed Prince and successor to the Crown by the Cortes, except the fact of being the son of who he was? The answer, surely, is no merit, no value, no virtue.