The Witcher: Blood Origin is out now on Netflix and is turning out to be an embarrassing premiere for a legendary franchise. We say this since the fans destroyed it and the critics gave it the worst rating in the history of the franchise.
What happens is that, as it counts tomatoesonly 50% of critics recommend watching The Witcher: Blood Origin. That’s not all, since 0% of users recommend it, having a rating of 1.5/5 among the opinions of fans.
In case you missed it: how many episodes does it have The Witcher: Blood Origin and why are they so few?
With the above, The Witcher it becomes the product of the saga with the worst rating in tomatoes. As a point of comparison, the first season of The Witcher it was recommended by 67% of critics and 75% of users. For its part, Season 2 was recommended by 100% of critics and 80% of users.
Related video: The story behind The Witcher
What does the critic say about The Witcher: Blood Origin?
But what does the critics say? The Witcher: Blood Origin? Some critics accuse it of being a project that simply doesn’t work and that it wastes its cast.
“The series wastes Michelle Yeoh, who is given relatively little to do other than some great but brief swordfights,” said Dan Jolin of Empire.
“The series certainly suffers without the muscular anchor of a Henry Cavill type, as his writing simply isn’t strong enough for the fragmented story he’s telling,” explained Sabastian Astley of Radio Times in his critique.
“The series offers no delights, even from a prequel perspective. He allows himself so much to tell that he forgets to show why the big events of the Witcher universe are important to the story,” said Zosha Milman of Polygon.
And you, have you seen The Witcher: Blood Origin? What do you think about this prequel series of The Witcher? Tell us in the comments.
Follow this link to see more news related to The Witcher.
Related Video: News Roundup for Week 47 of 2022
Editorial: Gaming / Facebook / Twitter / Youtube / instagram / News / discord /Telegram / Google news
