The first report that the Civil Guard has sent to the Supreme Court points directly to the Prosecutor’s Office as the origin of the leak of the emails of Alberto González Amador, partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso. The document, which elDiario.es has been able to examine, does not contain concrete evidence to show where the information came from but deduces that “the leak must begin” in the Public Ministry, detailing the conversations that the provincial prosecutor of Madrid Pilar Rodríguez had with the own attorney general in those days of March and asks Judge Ángel Hurtado to analyze in depth the emails and messages of Álvaro García Ortiz upon understanding that he had a “preeminent participation” in the process that led to the leak.
The UCO agents have already sent the first report that Judge Hurtado commissioned after the searches at the end of October: a 57-page analysis of all the e-mail messages intercepted by Pilar Rodríguez. Messages that start in the first week of March of this year, before elDiario.es exclusively published that the Prosecutor’s Office had denounced Alberto González Amador for a double tax fraud of more than 350,000 euros.
The bulk of the report focuses on March 13 and 14, when the newspaper El Mundo published information in which it stated that the Prosecutor’s Office had offered an agreement to González Amador’s lawyer. At that moment, the Attorney General’s Office contacted Rodríguez and began to request those emails from the prosecutor Julián Salto, the one who investigated and reported the businessman, to issue a press release denying that information: it was the lawyer, and not the Prosecutor’s Office, who He put the pact on the table.
The intercepted emails and messages do not reflect whether the Prosecutor’s Office leaked or gave an order to leak that information to the press, being the SER Chain the first to echo the specific content of Alberto González’s emails at 11:51 p.m. that same night. But among its conclusions it does assume that the leak started in the Public Ministry, with the “preeminent” role that the attorney general himself has recognized when preparing the statement issued by the Madrid Prosecutor’s Office the following morning.
Judge Hurtado already has this report on the table and has lifted the summary secrecy that weighed on him, although he has specified in one of his resolutions that “its dissemination to third parties is prohibited.” He is still waiting for the same judicial police unit to analyze the emails and messages seized from the attorney general on October 30, a task that he reinforced this Monday by requesting that they make a copy of the seized material and analyze the communications dated between the March 8 and 14 of this year.
The night of March 13
The UCO report that the case instructor already handles begins its analysis on March 8: when the Attorney General’s Office contacts Pilar Rodríguez to request documentation for the case of Alberto González Amador, three days after the fraud complaint was filed. tax and documentary falsification. The communications continued until March 13, one day after this newspaper published the existence of the complaint, El Mundo stated in a report at 9:29 p.m. that the Prosecutor’s Office offered an agreement to Alberto González Amador. Other media, not mentioned in the report, added more false statements spread by Miguel Ángel Rodríguez: that the leadership of the Prosecutor’s Office had backed down from the pact.
The succession of emails, as the attorney general has acknowledged in public and in writing, reveals how it was Álvaro García Ortiz himself who insisted that the prosecutor Julián Salto, who at that time was at a soccer match, send the emails that he exchanged with Alberto González Amador’s lawyer in order to prepare an informative note denying the inaccuracies and hoaxes published in the last few hours. Various prosecutors involved in the communications highlight, on several occasions, that the emails are “impeccable”, that they are not revealing any secret information and that everything had already been disseminated by the media.
These emails and messages analyzed by the Central Operational Unit do not reveal any order from any of the prosecutors to leak these emails to the press, sticking to the preparation of the statement from the Madrid Prosecutor’s Office that arrived at ten in the morning the next day. They also reflect the discomfort of the prosecutor Pilar Rodríguez due to various information about her and the tension between the Attorney General’s Office and the chief prosecutor of Madrid, Almudena Lastra, over the management of the matter.
Add Comment