ChatGPT vs Bard interface
On the interface, both have a very simple cover where you can write the question with which you will start chatting and in the case of Bard it has a left bar where menus are displayed to request help or see the most recent activity you have had, in In the case of ChatGPT, you can find these options when you pass the cursor over your user, so prioritize in the left bar that you see your interaction history.
In this sense, I find the ChatGPT interface more useful because it allows you to see what questions you have asked without having to click three times, as is the case with Bard. Regarding the questions, for several months I have been interacting with ChatGPT in Spanish and English, so for this test I decided to create a special account so that I would not have any conversation history.
Another aspect to do the test was to ask the same questions to each one, with the same wording and language so that there was no bias. When questioning both about what they think about generative artificial intelligence, both gave a very similar answer because they agree that they can be helpful for the daily tasks of hundreds of people in the world, however Bard has a more emotional and In response to this question, he said he felt fabulous to be the protagonist, while ChatGPT pointed out that he has a great responsibility for being popular.
Who is more responsive, ChatGPT or Bard?
With both, I also questioned their perspective on human emotions or on what they think about the possible substitution of jobs and in this sense their answers were different. For his part, ChatGPT pointed out that he could not have a judgment on human feelings because he is an AI, while Bard said that love was one of the feelings he most admired in humanity.
As for their perspective on whether they’re going to replace humans, both tools said they couldn’t predict the future, but part of their job is to help with repetitive tasks, citing some future-of-work studies to back up this idea. .
In the execution of doing more specific tasks, in both cases I asked them to make me a travel itinerary that included costs for a five-day trip to New York and although the two gave similar answers, the tone between Bard and ChatGPT is different, because the first is inclined to be friendlier, while the second is more concrete and also more exact.
Despite the fact that both broke down the possible plans, ChatGPT also drew routes, that is, it defined what to do, at what time of the day and took into account the estimated time in the visits, while Bard only limited itself to indicating the options for days. attractions.
The same thing happened when asking them to develop a marketing plan for a Mexican candy campaign in the United States, because while Bard recommended some states where it could be successful, ChatGPT developed strategies to have not only the marketing plan but also a sales and distribution plan.
conclusions
Although both intelligences are under development, the OpenAI database has been in charge of having a more specific approach, while Bard has a friendlier development, where they are generating a more emotional AI that seeks to be closer to users.
On a personal level I have also tried the integration of ChatGPT on Bing and one of the tools of its interface that I liked the most was the ‘personality’ with which you want me to talk to you, because in my day to day I prefer that the search engine focus on being effective, rather than friendly, but in some cases it is good to have a more casual interaction. Although Bard had good responses, at this point in development it is noticeable that ChatGPT is being trained more.
